YouTube Channel: "NewsNation"
Video Title: "Luis Elizando: House UAP hearing a 'win-win' for America | Cuomo"

Luis Elizando: House UAP hearing a ‘win-win’ for America | Cuomo
169,284 views  Nov 13, 2024

Luis Elizando, the former head of a government agency that studied UFOs, said Wednesday’s second House hearing on the issue was a “win-win” — a historic day for Congress and the American people. Elizondo talked about his testimony on NewsNation’s “CUOMO.”
#uap #ufo #luiseliznado

From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xfNkeZMl34

Transcript:

THOSE ANSWERS. SO THE QUESTION
IS WHY ARE THEY PUSHING THE
BALL FORWARD? MORE? LET'S ASK
THE MAN THAT YOU JUST SAW
THERE, FORMER MILITARY
INTELLIGENCE AND
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OFFICER
LUIS ELIZONDO JOINS US NOW.
THANK YOU FOR MAKING YOUR
WITNESS TODAY. I WANT THE
AUDIENCE TO KNOW. YOU'RE ALSO
AUTHOR OF IMMINENT INSIDE THE
PENTAGON'S HUNT FOR UF OWES.
LOUIS, THANK YOU FOR BEING
WITH US. CHRIS, THANK YOU SO
MUCH FOR HAVING ME. WERE YOU
WORRIED ABOUT WHAT YOU'RE
GOING TO SAY TODAY? YEAH,
ABSOLUTELY. BUT I GOT TO SAY,
CHRIS, I THINK THIS WAS REALLY
A HISTORIC DAY FOR.
FOR BOTH CONGRESS AND FOR
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. I THINK
IT WAS A WIN-WIN. THIS IS NOW
THE SECOND HEARING ON THIS
TOPIC THAT'S BEEN OPEN TO THE
PUBLIC AND HOPEFULLY THE
PUBLIC IS NOW GETTING A AND
UNDERSTANDING OF HOW LONG OUR
GOVERNMENT HAS ACTUALLY BEEN
INVOLVED IN THIS TOPIC.
DESPITE DECADES OF DENIAL.
NO LITTLE GREEN MEN. THEY
DON'T HAVE A SPACESHIP FROM
OUTSIDE OUR SOLAR SYSTEM. ALL
OF THESE TYPES OF VIDEOS THAT
I'M SHOWING RIGHT NOW
CAN BE EXPLAINED. WELL,
THEN WHAT ARE THEY FINDING?
THIS IS WHAT YOU DID AND
YOU'RE RISKING YOUR REPUTATION
TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK.
WHAT YOU SAY IS THE TRUTH. SO
WHAT DO THEYNOW? WELL,
MORE THAN MY REPUTATION. I'M
RISKING.
MY SECURITY CLEARANCE AND
MY ABILITY TO EVEN EARN A
LIVING. SO I THINK ITS
WE HAVE ABSOLUTELY BEEN ABLE
TO CONFIRM THE EXISTENCE OF
SOME SORT OF TECHNOLOGY THAT
HAS THE ABILITY TO OPERATE
WITH ANONYMITY WITHIN OUR
CONTROLLED U.S. AIRSPACE,
OPERATE OVER OUR SENSITIVE
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS AND
POSSIBLY POSSIBLY INTERFERE
WITH THEIR NUCLEAR EQUITIES.
NOW, IF THAT'S NOT A NATIONAL
SECURITY CONCERN. I DON'T KNOW
WHAT IS.
NOW THAT'S WHY THEY SAY SO.
OKAY. YEAH. SOME OTHER COUNTRY
OR AT SOME OTHER CONCERN OF
CORPORATE CONCERN ON EARTH.
AND THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T TELL
US BECAUSE IT'S TOO DANGEROUS.
BUT YOU SAY TO THAT. SO,
CHRIS, LET'S LOOK AT THIS FROM
A TEMPORAL PERSPECTIVE. OKAY.
WE'VE BEEN DEALING WITH THIS
FOR DECADES AND DOCUMENTS NOW
HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO
CONGRESS.
THAT CREW WITHOUT A SHOT OF
THE DOUBT SINCE THE EARLY
1950'S 50'S WE'VE BEEN DEALING
WITH THIS WITH THIS ISSUE. AND
WHEN I SAY DEALING WITH THIS
ISSUE, TALKING ABOUT OBJECTS
THAT STILL TO THIS DAY CAN
OPERATE BEYOND ANY TYPE OF
OUR MARTIN AIRCRAFT. SO I
WOULD SAY, LOOK, IF ONE WERE
TO SAY LAYBY, THIS IS RUSSIA
OR CHINA TODAY. OKAY. BUT THAT
60'S WHERE THESE AIRCRAFT WERE
CAPTURED ON RADAR, DOING
10,013 1000 MILES. AN HOUR IN
A LOW EARTH ATMOSPHERE. OKAY.
WHAT WE HAVE IN COMPARISON
PALES FOR EXAMPLE. THE LA
QUINTA WIFE SR 71 CAN DO ABOUT
3200 MILES AN HOUR.
UNCLASSIFIED LEVEL, WHICH IS
PRETTY FAST. AND WHEN WANT TO
TAKE A RIGHT HAND TURN TAKES
ROUGHLY HALF THE STATE OF OHIO
TO DO THAT. AND WHAT WE ARE
SEEING OR OBJECTS THAT ARE
DOING 10,013 1000 MILES, AN
HOUR AND ARE ABLE TO EXECUTE
IMMEDIATE RIGHT ANGLE DO 180
DEGREES POP IN AND OUT OF OUR
ATMOSPHERE AND EVEN
UNDERWATER. SO. WHERE IN THE
1950'S? WELL, WE HAVE BARELY
BROKEN THE SOUND BARRIER AND
HAD AND HAD EVEN MADE IT INTO
SPACE. WHAT OTHER NEAR PIER
COUNTRY EVEN EXISTED AT THAT
POINT THAT TO THIS DAY CAN
PERFORM LIKE THAT. THE ANSWER
IS WE CAN'T. AND IF THERE WAS
A COUNTRY THAT COULD DO THAT,
CHRIS, THIS WOULD BE THE
THIS COUNTRY HAS EVER FACED.
EVEN ECLIPSING THAT OF 9.11 BY
AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE BECAUSE
DESPITE THE BILLIONS OF
DOLLARS WE POUR IN INVESTMENT
COMMUNITY, NOT A SINGLE THREAD
OF OF INTELLIGENCE OVER THE
LAST 7 DECADES HAS GIVEN US UK
SHOULD THAT SOME ADVERSARY HAS
DEVELOPED THIS TECHNOLOGY IN
SECRET AND BEEN ABLE TO
DEPLOYED EFFECTIVELY.
AND IF THEY HAD 7 DECADES
AGO, WHAT WOULD THEY BE DOING
WITH IT TODAY? AND NOBODY IS.
AND THAT RAISES QUESTIONS ALSO
MR. ELIZONDO, ANYTIME YOU WANT
TO TALK YTIME THEY'RE
DEVELOPMENTS OR THERE SHOULD
BE IN. THERE HAVE NOT YOU HAVE